Re: Re: telegard
  By: Scott Adams to Gene Buckle on Tue Dec 26 2006 03:59 am

 >  -=> Quoting Gene Buckle to Gene Buckle <=-
 > 
 >  >   Re: Re: telegard
 >  >   By: Bryan Hamilton to Sean Dennis on Wed Dec 13 2006 07:29 pm
 >  >
 >  >  >  SD> Bryan Hamilton wrote in a message to All:
 >  >  >  BH> so what's the lastest info on telegard? any new developers?
 >  >  >  SD> Nope. Telegard is dead in the water. Check out:
 >  >  >  SD> http://www.wikipedia.org/telegard (I believe it's right) -
 >  >  >
 >  >  > the right address is
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telegard and i'll st
 >  >  > reading it right after I post this msg
 >  >  >
 >  >
 >  > Do you think anyone would be interested in a native Linux version of Tele
 >  > 2.7?  I got bored and ported it some years ago.. It builds under Free Pas
 >  >
 >  GB> bah!  I made a mistake.  THe version wasn't 2.7, but 2.5.
 > 
 >      Oh god.  Then no.  :)
 > 
 >      2.5 had some serious bugs in it in some areas if i recall
 >      the code.  At least 2.7 fixed it.  Then in that case
 >      it would be a use at your own risk :)
 > 
 >      How much did you rewrite of it?
 > 
 > 
 > ... "There was the waiting. Terrible waiting." - Franklin

George Roberts based Nexus on the 2.5 code and rewrote just about all of it.


This message has ended, go in peace...
--- SBBSecho 2.11-Win32