>> How can she? Republicans have not (yet) passed Amy Coney Barrett into the
>> supreme court. When/if they do then the democrats will do what they need to

> I suppose there's some way to add more seats to the court, and with those new
> seats added, a Democrat president (or any president) can go ahead and fill
> them up accordingly.

That is one possibility. There is no limit to the number of judges that can sit
on the supreme court. I think it would be a shame if the number had to grow
because of the because republicans try to pack the supreme court with
conservative justices who would kill Roe v. Wade. Amy Coney Barrett signed an
ad supporting the end of the "barbaric" (her words)  Roe v. wade decision.

I am pro life but I think the decision a woman makes regarding her unborn child
is best made by herself in consultation with her family and doctor. Legislators
are unneeded in that decision/process.

There is also the decision regarding the Trump administrations desire to kill
the ACA that will be in the courts November 10. A packed conservative supreme
court decision could devastate both of those cases and Americans generally for
years to come. 

> Joe Biden should come out and say "I won't do that," but instead, he keeps
> his fans happy with the idea that maybe he will do that, but then after the
> election, he can throw those people's ambition down the drain.

Joe Biden likely does not want to increase the number of justices.

>> The dirtiest detail of it is that she tried to dodge the question; so
>> Americans can find out after the fact.

The ball is in republican hands at the moment.
 
>> Americans are well aware of all the facts around the nomination.

> Sure, but they're not aware of Biden & Harris' intentions regarding
> court-packing.

It's not their game right now. We'll have to let the republicans do whatever it
is they do and we go from there.

--- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Toy-4