From: "Rich" 

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_003A_01C2B404.FFEDD240
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

   And I have no doubt that this is an issue.  I've only pointed out =
that despite Adam's claims, this is not what George and I discussed =
earlier not that this isn't a potential IP violation.

Rich

  "Randy H"  wrote in message =
news:3e174f73{at}w3.nls.net...
  A quick check to Patent and Trademark databases shows 'Klingon' as =
being registered by
  Paramount.=20

  It dopesn't matter what any of us believe-it will be up to the IP =
owners to make the call as to whether
  this production is infringing or not.
    "Rich"  wrote in message news:3e174a9c$1{at}w3.nls.net...
       I noticed that someone else mentioned this.  I don't remember it =
probably because no other ship had any particular identify.  They were =
all pale shadows of the Enterprise manned by disposable crew.

    Rich

      "Jeff Shultz"  wrote in message =
news:j9ce1vshm6ikroaadfgi54avm519p31phk{at}4ax.com...
      On Fri, 3 Jan 2003 20:58:26 -0800, "Rich"  wrote:

      >   You are embarrassing yourself.  Again, to support your claim =
can you provide a reference that identifies the intent.  There is no =
doubt that this story takes place in the Star Trek universe and while =
that is likely an issue what I saw was that they intentionally avoided =
any use of Star Trek or the existing characters in Star Trek.
      >

      Just because I like tweaking your nose Rich, it should be noted =
that
      both the Starship Exeter and the Starship Lexington appeared in =
the
      original series.=20

      Just a thought...
------=_NextPart_000_003A_01C2B404.FFEDD240
Content-Type: text/html;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable








   And I
have no doubt that =
this is an=20
issue.  I've only pointed out that despite Adam's claims, this is
= not what=20
George and I discussed earlier not that this isn't a potential IP=20
violation.
 
Rich
 

  "Randy H" <randy_holcomb{at}attglobal.netmailto:randy_holcomb{at}attglobal.net">randy_holcomb{at}attglobal.net
A>>=20
  wrote in message news:3e174f73{at}w3.nls.net...
  A quick check to Patent and Trademark databases =
shows=20
  'Klingon' as being registered by
  Paramount. 
   
  It dopesn't matter what any of us believe-it will =
be up to=20
  the IP owners to make the call as to whether
  this production is infringing or
not.
  

    "Rich" <{at}> wrote in message news:3e174a9c$1{at}w3.nls.net...
       I
noticed that someone =
else=20
    mentioned this.  I don't remember it probably because no other =
ship had=20
    any particular identify.  They were all pale shadows of the =
Enterprise=20
    manned by disposable crew.
     
    Rich
     
    
      "Jeff Shultz" <jeff{at}shultzinfosystems.com=">mailto:jeff{at}shultzinfosystems.com">jeff{at}shultzinfosystems.com=
>=20
      wrote in message news:j9ce1vshm6i=
kroaadfgi54avm519p31phk{at}4ax.com...On=20
      Fri, 3 Jan 2003 20:58:26 -0800, "Rich" <{at}>=20
      wrote:>   You are embarrassing =
yourself.  Again,=20
      to support your claim can you provide a reference that identifies =
the=20
      intent.  There is no doubt that this story takes place in the =
Star=20
      Trek universe and while that is likely an issue what I saw was =
that they=20
      intentionally avoided any use of Star Trek or the existing =
characters in=20
      Star Trek.>Just because I like
tweaking your nose =
Rich, it=20
      should be noted thatboth the Starship Exeter and the Starship=20
      Lexington appeared in theoriginal series.
Just a=20
   
thought...

------=_NextPart_000_003A_01C2B404.FFEDD240--

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-4