From: "Rich" 

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_0613_01C2B3D9.D073F290
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

   You continue to embarrass yourself.  I saw no use of "Star Trek" =
anyway.  Can you support any of your claims?

Rich

  "Adam Flinton"  wrote in message =
news:3e16b9f5{at}w3.nls.net...
  How can you possibly say "they intentionally avoided any use of Star =
Trek "?
  Direct Star Trek references litter the site entirely purposely.

  I'm sure they've used new characters. I'm sure they've got a new plot. =
This
  is no different from STNG vs the orig ST or DS9 but it's still Star =
Trek
  based just as DS9 & even "Enterprise" are.

  In fact it's more closely based on the orig ST than any of the modern =
series
  (by design).

  Adam


  "Rich"  wrote in message news:3e16690c{at}w3.nls.net...
     You are embarrassing yourself.  Again, to support your claim can =
you
  provide a reference that identifies the intent.  There is no doubt =
that this
  story takes place in the Star Trek universe and while that is likely =
an
  issue what I saw was that they intentionally avoided any use of Star =
Trek or
  the existing characters in Star Trek.

  Rich

  "Adam Flinton"  wrote in message
  news:3e1606a0{at}w3.nls.net...
  Do you set out to embarrass yourself or does it just seem to happen to =
you a
  lot?

  What do worrds like "Klingon" & "Star Fleet"
& the use of "NCC-" as =
part of
  the spaceship code mean to you?

  & when the white outline of the Enterprise flys by on the top of the
  page.....

  I won't go on but I could if you really really wish to be embarrassed =
some
  more.

  Adam

  "Rich"  wrote in message news:3e1600fd{at}w3.nls.net...
     What I saw on the web site was a claim that it was an original =
story with
  original characters.  Can you support your claim or are you just =
making this
  up?

  Rich

  "Adam Flinton"  wrote in message
  news:3e156176{at}w3.nls.net...
  It is clearly aimed to be a derivative work.

  Adam
  "Rich"  wrote in message news:3e14fcc6$1{at}w3.nls.net...
     Maybe you can confirm but something I read earlier claimed that =
this used
  all new characters.  From your quote below they use a new star ship =
and I
  don't see any use of the Star Trek name.  That's not to say that there =
may
  not be issues but this doesn't match what George had used as an =
example for
  the above and other reasons.

  Rich

  "Adam Flinton"  wrote in message
  news:3e14dd12{at}w3.nls.net...
  I just found it one of those bizarre coincidences given your use of =
Star
  Trek as an example in your copyright argument with Rich (& here is =
someone
  doing exeactly that) & the fact that it was the Canopus plague....


  Adam

  "Geo."  wrote in message
news:3e14cbfb{at}w3.nls.net...
  > "Adam Flinton"  wrote in message
  > news:3e14ac46{at}w3.nls.net...
  > > Coz it ain't done by the movie/TV studio......
  > >
  > > http://homepage.mac.com/starshipexeter/
  >
  > The U.S.S. Exeter,
  > freshly recrewed and
  > commanded by Capt.
  > John Garrovick, is on
  > a mission to save
  > a ship infected with
  > the deadly Canopus
  > Plague.
  >
  > ROFL!! 
  >
  > Geo.
  >
  >


------=_NextPart_000_0613_01C2B3D9.D073F290
Content-Type: text/html;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable








   You
continue to embarrass=20
yourself.  I saw no use of "Star Trek" anyway. 
Can you = support any of=20
your claims?
 
Rich
 

  "Adam Flinton" <adam{at}NOSPAMsoftfab.com>">mailto:adam{at}NOSPAMsoftfab.com">adam{at}NOSPAMsoftfab.com>
=
wrote in=20
  message news:3e16b9f5{at}w3.nls.net...Ho=
w can=20
  you possibly say "they intentionally avoided any use of Star Trek =
"?Direct=20
  Star Trek references litter the site entirely purposely.I'm =
sure=20
  they've used new characters. I'm sure they've got a new plot. =
Thisis no=20
  different from STNG vs the orig ST or DS9 but it's still Star =
Trekbased=20
  just as DS9 & even "Enterprise"
are.In fact it's more =
closely=20
  based on the orig ST than any of the modern series(by=20
 
design).Adam"Rich"
<{at}> wrote in message news:3e16690c{at}w3.nls.net...&nbs=
p; =20
  You are embarrassing yourself.  Again, to support your claim can=20
  youprovide a reference that identifies the intent.  There is =
no doubt=20
  that thisstory takes place in the Star Trek universe and while =
that is=20
  likely anissue what I saw was that they intentionally avoided any =
use of=20
  Star Trek orthe existing characters in Star =
Trek.Rich"Adam=20
  Flinton" <adam{at}NOSPAMsoftfab.com>">mailto:adam{at}NOSPAMsoftfab.com">adam{at}NOSPAMsoftfab.com>
=
wrote in=20
  messagenews:3e1606a0{at}w3.nls.net...Do
= you set=20
  out to embarrass yourself or does it just seem to happen to you=20
  alot?What do worrds like
"Klingon" & "Star Fleet" =
& the=20
  use of "NCC-" as part ofthe spaceship code mean to =
you?& when=20
  the white outline of the Enterprise flys by on the top of=20
  thepage.....I won't go on but I could if
you really really =
wish to=20
  be embarrassed
somemore.Adam"Rich"
<{at}> wrote =
in=20
  message news:3e1600fd{at}w3.nls.net...&nbs=
p; =20
  What I saw on the web site was a claim that it was an original story=20
  withoriginal characters.  Can you support your claim or are =
you just=20
  making
thisup?Rich"Adam
Flinton" <adam{at}NOSPAMsoftfab.com>">mailto:adam{at}NOSPAMsoftfab.com">adam{at}NOSPAMsoftfab.com>
=
wrote in=20
  messagenews:3e156176{at}w3.nls.net...It
= is=20
  clearly aimed to be a derivative
work.Adam"Rich" <{at}> =
wrote=20
  in message news:3e14fcc6$1{at}w3.nls.net...=
  =20
  Maybe you can confirm but something I read earlier claimed that this=20
  usedall new characters.  From your quote below they use a new =
star=20
  ship and Idon't see any use of the Star Trek name.  That's =
not to say=20
  that there maynot be issues but this doesn't match what George had =
used as=20
  an example forthe above and other =
reasons.Rich"Adam=20
  Flinton" <adam{at}NOSPAMsoftfab.com>">mailto:adam{at}NOSPAMsoftfab.com">adam{at}NOSPAMsoftfab.com>
=
wrote in=20
  messagenews:3e14dd12{at}w3.nls.net...I
=
just=20
  found it one of those bizarre coincidences given your use of =
StarTrek as=20
  an example in your copyright argument with Rich (& here is=20
  someonedoing exeactly that) & the fact that it was the Canopus =

 
plague....Adam"Geo."
<georger{at}nls.net>">mailto:georger{at}nls.net">georger{at}nls.net>
wrote in =
message news:3e14cbfb{at}w3.nls.net...>=
 "Adam=20
  Flinton" <adam{at}NOSPAMsoftfab.com>">mailto:adam{at}NOSPAMsoftfab.com">adam{at}NOSPAMsoftfab.com>
=
wrote in=20
  message> news:3e14ac46{at}w3.nls.net...>=
 >=20
  Coz it ain't done by the movie/TV studio......>
>> =
> http://homepage.mac.com/" target="new">http://homepage.mac.com/=">http://homepage.mac.com/starshipexeter/">http://homepage.mac.com/=
starshipexeter/>>=20
  The U.S.S. Exeter,> freshly recrewed
and> commanded by=20
  Capt.> John Garrovick, is on> a mission
to save> =
a ship=20
  infected with> the deadly Canopus> =
Plague.>>=20
  ROFL!! <both the canopus plague and the MB =
format..>>>=20
 
Geo.>>

------=_NextPart_000_0613_01C2B3D9.D073F290--

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-4