Very interesting commentary from Chuck Colson's BREAKPOINT website,
http://www.breakpoint.org
==================================================================
 
       Been There, Done That: Is Filegate the Next Watergate?
 
If I qualify as an expert in any field besides prisons, it's government
scandals. After all, I was part of the granddaddy of all contemporary
scandals: Watergate.
 
Perhaps that's why reporters and friends are probing me for my view of the
current scandal, which the Fourth Estate has dubbed "Filegate." What folks
ask me most often is: Does Filegate rank on a par with Watergate? And will
the scandal sink this administration?
 
My hunch is that in some ways Filegate may ultimately extend far beyond
the crimes of Watergate. After all, the crime that put me behind bars was
to leak information to the press taken from a single FBI file. The current
scandal involves 700 files-files containing highly confidential
information. This is nothing short of domestic spying carried out at the
highest levels of government on a massive scale.
 
My second hunch is that even such a large-scale scandal will not have the
same effects Watergate did. The Watergate hearings, coming on the heels of
a very divisive war, unleashed a huge tide of moral outrage and pent up
anger. But we are a decidedly different people from what we were 20 years
ago, and I'm not sure that we are even capable of such outrage today.
Americans have become morally desensitized.
 
How did this happen?
 
During the past two decades, we've been bombarded by scandals that were
often concocted by political elites. We turn on our television sets and see
politicians claiming to be shocked, shocked, at what their opponents are up
to. We've come to expect the news menu to include the scandal du jour-and
now we have trouble recognizing real scandals and summoning up the
appropriate moral indignation.
 
But the deeper change in our national character since the seventies is
that we've succumbed to moral relativism-the philosophy that everyone lives
by his own private code of ethics. If ethics is really a private matter,
then who are we to criticize anyone else? Who are we to judge?
 
A recent U.S. News and World Report poll reveals how deeply this
philosophy has invaded American life. When asked what qualities they valued
in a leader, a majority of Americans said they valued a candidate's
position on the issues over his moral character. In fact, 67 percent of
those polled said a candidate can govern effectively even if he has
substantial flaws in his personal character.
 
But one of the most fundamental principles of ethics is that moral
responsibility in the smaller things is the only reliable preparation for
larger tasks. Far from being trivial, minor tests of character are the best
basis on which to predict future behavior.
 
That's why we need to educate our neighbors on the vital connection
between private and public virtue-of how personal immorality leads directly
to institutional decay. If we're willing to scuttle the importance of
personal virtue, we cannot expect our public institutions to somehow
magically retain a virtuous character-as Filegate is now showing us.
 
But Filegate, with its suggestion that political operatives were examining
private data on Americans, just might shake a morally jaded populace out of
its spiritual torpor-and that's important. Because as we learned with
Watergate, this country can survive a morally flawed president. What it
can't survive is a morally indifferent electorate.
 
 
 
                             (c)1996 Prison Fellowship
 
If you want to share this commentary, just cut and paste the following
HTML code into any e-mail or posting to any appropriate newsgroup or forum.
It will become a hyper-link to this page.
 
 read this 
commentary
 
***
 * OLXWin 1.00b * Off-Line Xpress for Windows
--- TriToss (tm) Professional 1.0 - (Unregistered)
---------------