From: Adam 

Geo wrote:
> "Adam" <""4thwormcastfromthemolehill\"{at}the
field.near the bridge"> wrote in
> message news:44681bb8{at}w3.nls.net...
>
>>> Neither should just accept it, that is, unless they really want to stop
> it.
>> But then stop what?
>>
>> A War?
>>
>> An unjust situation?
>>
>> A land grab by a more powerful neighbor?
>>
>> A fear of others backed by the holocaust?
>>
>> What exactly are you asking them to stop?
>
> Call it whatever you like, the current situation is more appealing to both
> sides than any possible peaceful solution. Perhaps if it were to escalate
> into a full blown war they might feel differently but this limited warfare
> appears to be an acceptable way to live to them (at least they must consider
> it better than the current alternatives) or it would be resolved.
>
> Geo.
>
>

It will do just that. In part thanks to Iraq. Now the mujeheddin have had
some good old fashioned on the job training vs a modern IT equipped
& armoured etc force it's just a time of getting in the required weaponry.

I'm sure there have been lots of "fact finding trips" &
"debriefing" events in Damascus & Tehran.

Like I say, I reckon the quickest way to peace is to make clear that the
world will pump all sorts of weapons into the theatre on both sides such
that the manufacturers can then put the "proven in combat"
stickers on them.

How good is starstreak vs an apache? Let's find out. How good is MLRS
against hardened targets? let's find out etc.

155'es all round. Basically it's what worked in the Lebanon.

First off a resupply mission into the Gaza Strip.

adam

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5