From: "Robert Comer" 

> Why should the Palestinians accept peace when

Neither should just accept it, that is, unless they really want to stop it.

--
Bob Comer


"Adam" <""4thwormcastfromthemolehill\"{at}the
field.near the bridge"> wrote in message
news:44679589{at}w3.nls.net...
> Robert Comer wrote:
>>> You mistake the egg for the chicken.  Why should the Palestinians accept
>>> peace and the defacto situation when they are so oppressed?
>>
>> As are you -- why should the Israeli's accept peace when innocent
>> civilians
>> are targeted?
>>
>
> Why should the Palestinians accept peace when
>
> (A) Innocent civilians are targeted if only to "pressure the
militants"
> e.g. via thousands of heavy calibre shells, no money for medicine & food
> etc
>
> (B) There are millions of excluded refugees
>
> (C) Someone keeps taking their land.
>
> (D) Someone decides their "security" is worth so much more than
> Palestinian's "security".
>
> etc.
>
> There is no equality. Take any measure from dead kiddies to death &
> destruction capability, international sponsors/protectors etc etc.
>
> Adam
>
>> The answer, of course, is that they both have to say enough is enough and
>> stop.  The Palestinians can't do it alone, the Israeli's can't do it
>> alone,
>> and we don't have as much influence on it as you seem to think.
>>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5