Robert Pearson wrote in a message to Andrew Leary:

 RP> On Thu Jul 04, 1996 (23:19), Andrew Leary wrote about ZONE NUMBERS:

 RP>      Now the question becomes, can we convince those who are
 RP> working on Binkley and related utilities (maybe the BT-XE team?) to
 RP> come up with a general way to handle zones > 4095?  Right off the
 RP> top of my head, I can think of at least three ways this could be
 RP> done, without changing the behavior of Binkley for zones 1-4095:

The question is not can it be done, but rather Should it?

With domain addressing, any network can be supported. Is it really worth
re-coding the way things are done for a vanity net number?


--- timEd/386 1.10+