-=> On 02-28-98  18:30, John Sampson did testify and affirm <=-
-=> to Robert Plett concerning A new theory <=-
 JS> As for Hillary, I still believe she may make a run for the
 JS> Democratic nomination for the Presidency in either 2000 or
 JS> 2004. She's addicted to the power and won't want to give it
 JS> up. At least not easily. And if others want to see her run,
 JS> they'll do anything to keep her from being indicted and
 JS> convicted.
RC>Hillarity will never take a position in which she's
RC>responsible to an electorate. She's the spider concealed in
RC>the web, pulling the strings of power from concealment. The
RC>most public position she'd take would be a near-autonomous
RC>appointed positon... such as "Supreme Court Justice". 
A. Hillarity is anything BUT funny. Hitlary might be a better moniker to 
put on La Primera Mujer.  I don't find a single thing she says or believes 
to be hillarious. 
B. I agree, to a point, that she is the spiderwoman pulling the strings. 
However, I believe she believes her own press and her own "legacy" is still 
to be made. What better way than to be the first female President in the 
history of the Republic? Besides, if Billy Bob got indicted and convicted, 
she could pardon him. 
John , jnsampson@ibm.net 
 "To find reasonable doubt, one must first be capable of reason."
___
 * WR 1.33 [NR] * UNREGISTERED EVALUATION COPY
--- Maximus/2 3.01
---------------