On 09/25/15, Wilfred van Velzen pondered and said...
 
 Wv> Almost all software in fidonet is vintage! ;)

True :)

 Wv> I don't know if you should call it 'failing'. Besides all the software
 Wv> used in this path:
 Wv> 
 Wv> @PATH: 292/854 221/1 320/119 261/38 230/150 0 203/0 640/384 712/848 770/1
 Wv> 
 Wv> "failed" to detect it. So you are in good company. ;)

So what software did pick up the "issue" and I guess the other question that
springs to my mind is hoe big a deal is it anyway?

Do we get many packets with those kinds of problems in them?

Just curious.. never really had to deal with this before but keen to run a
tight ship here and ensure from a best practice standpoint I am running what
I can in the correct fashion :)

Best, Paul

-- 
    Agency BBS, New Zealand | bbs.geek.nz | telnet: agency.bbs.geek.nz:23

--- Mystic BBS v1.10 (Windows)