On 09/25/15, Wilfred van Velzen pondered and said...
 
 Wv> Yes you did. Although the pkt would have been fine when it arrived at
 Wv> your system. The contents of the message wasn't: An empty From, To and
 Wv> Subject. And a date 15 years in the past. It arrived here with this
 Wv> session:
 Wv> 
 Wv> + 24 Sep 16:55:41 [5865] incoming session with cl-365.wlg-01.nz.sixxs.net
 Wv> [2001:4428:200:16c::2]

Thanks, that helped me track it down.

So the question is have I misconfigured anything at this end or is it really
a failing of the vintage nature of the software I am using? FastEcho?

+ 25 Sep 02:55:11 FSTE begin, FastEcho 1.46.1; TOSS
  25 Sep 02:55:11 FSTE Unpacking C:\HUB\ECHOMAIL\IN\040F1E03.FR0 (ZIP)
  25 Sep 02:55:11 FSTE ·[Fri Sep 25, 2015 02:55:04] Un-/Compressed size:
329/512 (0.6:1)
  25 Sep 02:55:11 FSTE Processing 1 inbound packets, 329 bytes
* 25 Sep 02:55:11 FSTE 56040ECD.PKT from 3:712/848 to 3:770/1 (10FF, Type 2+)

Thanks, Paul.

-- 
    Agency BBS, New Zealand | bbs.geek.nz | telnet: agency.bbs.geek.nz:23

--- Mystic BBS v1.10 (Windows)