Hi,

On 2015-09-24 20:20:37, Tommi Koivula wrote to Wilfred van Velzen:
  about: "":

 WV>> I got this message too, 3 times, through different paths, but they
 WV>> all
 WV>> ended up in my bad area, because of the old date (2000-01-01). I'm a
 WV>> bit surprised all these systems this message passed through, send it
 WV>> on, the way it was!?

 WV>> The path of shame: ;)

 WV>> @PATH: 292/854 221/1 320/119 261/38 230/150 0 203/0 640/384 712/848
 WV>> 770/1

 TK> FastEcho at 2:221/1 passed the crap but Hpt at 2:221/0 did reject.

 TK> ----------  Thu 24 Sep 15, hpt/os2-emx 1.9.0-cur 07-09-15
 TK> 7 14:34:49  pkt: d:\husky\inbound\temp\5C26BE7B.tos [2:221/1]
 TK> Glacier -- On the road ... (2:292/854.1)SEEN-BY: 45/0 203/0 221/0 1 6 360
 TK> 230/0 250/1 261/38 263/1 280/464 5003 5555SEEN-BY: 292/854 301/520 331/51
 TK> 400/333 421/790 450/68 463/68 464/5555SEEN-BY: 467/70 712/848 2432/0
 TK> 5020/715@PATH: 292/854 221/1) is longer than 35 bytes. A 14:34:49  wrong
 TK> msg header: fromUserName () is longer than 35 bytes. A 14:34:49  wrong msg
 TK> header: renaming pkt to bad. A 14:34:49  Renaming pkt/arc to .bad

[After some searching through my logs]

Something identical happend hear with the original I got directly from Ward:

------------  Thu 2015-09-24, FMail-W32-1.69.7.134-Beta20150923
13:34:45.051  TOSS
13:34:45.382  Processing 41330060.PKT from 2:292/854 to 2:280/464
13:34:45.382  Pkt info: D'Bridge 255.00, Type 2+, 1342, 2015-09-24 13:30:10,
Pwd, Sec
13:34:45.392  Skipping garbage in PKT file...
...

And it tossed just 1 legit message from this PKT file which further contains 5
malformed messages...

Bye, Wilfred.


--- FMail-W32-1.69.7.134-B20150923