-=> On 09-12-02  15:36, Thom Lacosta <=-
 -=> spoke to Dale Shipp about P4 Draft (ver. 5) <=-

 TL> But now I'm confused...I thought Bob said that per Ward the 
 TL> number of RC's required to vote wasn't what's in P4.

  To tell the truth, I'm not sure that Ward really said that he would
  count passage based on a majority of the RCs responding, versus a
  majority of all RCs.   He might well have said that he would do some
  active testing to check if an RC still existed -- and then base the
  result on the number of RCs who respond to that testing (and remove
  the rest?).   TTTT, I don't really know what he would do.  I only know
  what policy 4.07 says.

 TL> If that's the case, what other things could the IC "interpret"(ie
 TL> change)? 

  Never a clear area for any *C.   Hopefully they use good judgement and
  justify the trust placed in them by those who voted them into office
  (or appointed them as the case may be).

                        dale (at) min (dot) net
                              (1:261/1466)



... Shipwrecked on Hesperus in Columbia, Maryland. 23:12:45 12 Sep 2002
___ Blue Wave/DOS v2.30

--- Maximus/2 3.01