From: "Bill Mattox" 

With this slimy bunch, anything is possible.

What really surprises me is the degree to which normally discerning folks
in here have so completely suckered by the Clinton propaganda machine
(believing this simply nothing other than a "fathers
rights/custody" issue), with few bothering to show even an ounce of
suspicion regarding Clinton's role and why he is so deeply involved in this
matter... and willing to take such wild risks.

I speculated on possible reasons over the weekend ( role in history
(normalization), fear of another boatlift, and/or blackmail (Castro could
easily have incriminating info from years of sophisticated intelligence
gathering)).

Interestingly enough, today's WSJ asks almost the same question and comes
up with a very similar list. (While the rest of the mainstream press
continues the facade that this is a Janet Reno/INS issue)

"Jeff Shultz"  wrote in message
news:39047d09$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> Yeah, apparently they had to wait for the ink was dry before telling the
> press about it.
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5