Hello Greg


GH> You'd be in the minority of people I speak to on the net, then. Most 
GH> either use their own version of Lynx or turn graphics off on whatever 
GH> prog they use. Less crap, more speed. ;-}

Well, each to his own.

In a 16 bit 1024 x 768 screen the pics look quite nice, and I can always
turn them off when I just want the info.

AS> I got sick of running some screens in 800 x 600 x 256 and others in 
AS> Pal,  and others in low res, etc. Now, everything just runs in 1024 
AS> x 768 Hi  Colour.
GH> 
GH> Never had to, myself but then again, with a standard 2000/030 without 
GH> even so much as a flicker fixer..... ;-}

That's what I mean - by today's standards, thatt's pretty well pre-historic.

AS> Windows 95 is not the bogey many people paint it out to be, and I 
AS> dare  say a person coming from an Amiga background can appreciate 
AS> it more and  tweek the sytem to get the most out of it.
GH> 
GH> Well to be honest with you, people I know and respect who have used IBM 
GH> and nothing else since I have known them disagree with you in the 
GH> strongest terms, even to the point of starting to refuse to write 
GH> ANYTHING for Win95 users. Apparently that is catching on, too. ;-}

I wouldn't take too much notice of a couple of twisted IBM cronies.

The software availability speaks for itself.



Arthur
arthurs{at}geocities.com
---