RH>I have no idea if this will work (I only recieved your first 2
RH>messages in this packet) and I'm not willing to see if it will lockup my
RH>machine .

Oh heck no!! I wouldn't ask anyone to do that! 

RH>Anyway, unlike under dos, OS/2 DosFind... requires you to
RH>free its internal buffers by calling DosFindClose(...).  This may or may
RH>not be your problem.  If its not in there, it should be anyway.

Nope, I had it in there and was very careful to make sure it was only called
when a valid handle was returned from DosFIndFirst.  I have had ???Close
functions hose the system before when itereated with bad handles. I was watchin

for that one closely...

The real problem was with LS 3.0.  It is a bug with IP07001 & memory getting
lost by the requester when doing directory searches on a redirected drive. 
IP07045 applied to LS 3.0 fixes it. I have been running that exact same code
constantly all week confidence testing it. Hasn't crashed yet. :)


RH>Richard Hasty
RH>Team OS/2

RH>   
RH> ~ KWQ/2 1.2g ~ Windws is ine for bckgroun comunicaions
RH> 
RH>

 
___
 * MR/2 1.52 NR * 3 things occur when you age.. 1) memory goes 2) uh.. um..

--- WILDMAIL!/WC v4.11