Thom wrote to Lawrence at 17:06 15 Sep:


 TL> So, I would submit that there needs to be no mention of Fidonews in
 TL> Policy 4. 

 LG> I think that association between Fidonet/FidoNews is valid, and
 LG> should be retained. 

 LG> However, any mention in Policy about the operation or management of
 LG> the FidoNews is beyond the scope of that document.

 TL> What might be acceptable then would be to have a mention of
 TL> it...but certainly no mention as to node number, requirement to
 TL> have, requirement to make available, etc.

I think that's reasonable.

---