Ross Sauer wrote in a message to Roger Nelson:
 RS> Oh, you've seen it? 
  
No.
 RN> Uh oh!
  
 RS> What?
Not allowed.
  
 RN> Credible in whose opinion?
  
 RS> In peer reviewed journals, arcaelogical societies, etc.
So, without naming any of those publications, are you suggesting that you 
subscribe to what was written therein?  How can you accept something so 
blindly simply because it is in print?  Maybe what you read was more in tune 
with your beliefs than anything else.  That is the same road the believers 
are on.
Regards,
Roger
Roger.Nelson@f7.n3828.z1.fidonet.org 
--- timEd/2 1.10+
---------------