-=> Quoting Sheila King to Dan Triplett <=-
 SK> I have heard before, from both teachers, students, and parents,
 SK> complaints of certain topics in math not being taught for mastery. The
 SK> teacher, maybe in fifth grade, say, teaches operations with fractions.
 SK> But, she knows that the kids will be re-taught the same lessons again
 SK> in sixth, seventh, and eighth grades.
I just got a phone call last night from a fellow parent of fifth math
bright fifth graders.  We're apparently into the flip side of this
problem.  That child was in tears over the problem that math was too
boring.  All they were doing was repeating the stuff they had already
done in previous grades.  When he asked for more challenging work he
was given another of series of logic problems where you have to figure
out the names in the picture from clues like "Sam is next to a bearded
man."  The first dozen or so were fun, but the kids are bored with these,
now, too.  My kid was giggling over the silliness of being asked to
"guess and check" for "The girls won four more ribbons than the boys;
together they won 32 ribbons; How many ribbons did the boys earn?"  It
was obvious to him that you subtract four to even it out, then divide by
2 to get 14 ribbons.
I wasn't too worried about my kid.  He's been after me to teach him 
about Algebra for a while, so we built a quick lesson letting "x" stand
for the boy's ribbons and he discovered that solving a linear equation did
the same thing he done.  I'm worried about the other kid, though.  His
parents aren't as strong on math, and will have difficulty keeping their
kid engaged.  I may have to take on a group.
I've had some negative experiences with this year's teaching team.  My
chronic lack of tack has become categorized as accusations in their mind.
We have a parent conference coming this week.  Maybe I can get my tackful
wife to lead the discussion about sufficiently challenging math.
So, when one of the students (or
 SK> more) is not mastering the operations, she consoles the student (and
 SK> parents?) saying, "It's ok if he doesn't learn it this year. They will
 SK> do this again next year." But, what does a kid gain from this
 SK> situation? Basically in fifth grade he learns that he doesn't
 SK> understand fractions, he feels frustration and probably fears that this
 SK> is a complicated topic that he is likely to experience difficulty with
 SK> forever, and then he sees it again in sixth grade. What attitudes and
 SK> expectations is he bringing with him to the sixth grade math classroom
 SK> with regard to fractions? I'd bet he has an instant disadvantage for
 SK> having been exposed to them unsuccessfully the previous year.
 SK> To get back on track with the question about the basic math facts,
 SK> suppose a student has made it all the way to fourth or fifth grade
 SK> without learning these facts, having seen them presented every year in
 SK> school up to then. What must such a student think of math? For their
 SK> whole school life they've been exposed to these dull and boring basic
 SK> facts. The kid probably thinks that this IS mathematics! (poor child)
 SK> If I were in that situation, I'd probably hate math and think that I
 SK> could never learn these facts. After all, I've spent 5 years of school
 SK> already trying to learn them and still haven't. No wonder Carl says it
 SK> is almost too late for these kids. Their attitude is probably so set
 SK> against even believing that they can learn these facts by this point
 SK> that it must be an incredible task to get them over this.
 SK> Seems to me that, just as students shouldn't leave third grade without
 SK> knowing how to read, and call in the RR teacher and other intervention
 SK> methods, kids shouldn't leave second grade without knowing their basic
 SK> addition and subtraction facts nor third without knowing
 SK> multiplication. Get intervention for these kids, what... a Math Facts
 SK> Recovery teacher?...and get them set up for success in math in fourth
 SK> and fifth grade instead of re-hashing basic material they should have
 SK> already learned.
 SK> As for going too fast in school...I don't know. Maybe in some things.
 SK> But seems to me that allowing until the end of second grade to learn
 SK> addition and subrtraction facts isn't going too fast. There should be
 SK> plenty of time in there for working with manipulatives and all other
 SK> things so that the kids can get that down by the end of second grade.
 SK> I think that to allow the kids longer than that does them a terrible
 SK> disservice and sets them up to do poorly in subsequent classes.
 SK> Sheila
 SK> -!- PCBoard (R) v15.3/M 10
 SK>  ! Origin: Castle of the Four Winds...subjective reality? (1:218/804)
 
___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.12
--- Maximus/2 3.01
---------------