> I don't see any problem with weird flavors of OPUS,
> unless they affect a sysop directly. If you are not having
> any difficulty, there is no need to worry about the flavor
> you're running. If you are having problems, the flavor
> really doesn't matter as long as you are aware of the fact
> that what is working for sysop John Doe might not work for
> you. If a sysop is not aware of the strong possibility of
> several flavors, then he does have a very real problem.
Bill,
I don't see your point here. I don't understand why, if you aren't running
Opus, you find it necessary to come into MEADOW and make dubious claims that
there are hacks of Opus around. I find the whole scenario extremely
nlikely.
I said it before and I'll say it again (I'm good at repeating myself):
If you're so sure that there are these two different Opus 1.73a versions
around, then prove it. Take a utility like file compare and show me where
the difference is. Tell me where the two versions came from.
Don't just come into the MEADOW and throw slime. Put up or shut up.
--- Opus-CBCS 1.73a
---------------
* Origin: Sci-Fido II, World's Oldest SF BBS, Berkeley, CA (1:161/84.0)
|