> so it's hard to tell which one you are referring to. But if you are
 > sure
 > it is a third and not a second generation I'll take your work for
 > it,
 > but I don't see that in the quality of the transfer. Remember, I
 > work
 > for ABC-News and I fix tape machines and cameras, but I will look at
 >
 > that tape even harder when I get back to work.  Are you sure the
 > third
 > generation isn't the copy of the off-air taping?
No, I'm not sure. In my video heyday as a tech., we didn't have digital
duplicating equipment. We had 1" and 3/4" dubbing machines. Although the
visual quality of the dupe was pretty good, the tell-tale generation gap
was still evident in the blanking.
 >->  > The fact that witnesses on the ground saw this as well makes it un
 >->  > likely it was a hoax.
 >->  >   If you do have Anti-gravity capabilities, then your gravity
 >->  > reference
 >->  > would be the craft and not the Earth.  Not inertial would be
 >->  > encountered
 >->  > because you would be moving your gravity reference (the ship) and not
 >->  > moving against the reference.  Wobbling or 90 degree turns would have
 >->  > no
 >->  > effect on the pilot.
 >-> You know this from experience, no doubt. 
 >    Well, I've been on a flying saucer or two in my time. ;-)  It
 > makes a
 > good explanation since a lot of abductees report no sensation of
 > motion
 > in the craft.  I figure you can't hang a 90 degree turn without
 > getting
 > crushed while moving at 7000mph, or even stopping or starting on a
 > dime.
 > I know you must have seen those shots of the craft just hoverings,
 > and
 > then it takes off at a tremendous speed.  It doesn't accelerate, it
 > is
 > just moving at top speed from the word GO.  Those can't be faked
 > because
 > it would require moving the object at such a high rate of speed, in
 > front
 > of the camera, that the object appears to stretch out in length, and
 >
 > stays like this through each frame of video.  I would really like to
 > see
 > someone try to fake that, just so we could see what it would look
 > like.
 > I haven't seen any takers yet, do you know of any? 
 >    Hey, I'm looking forward to finding out if it is real or not.
Many videos are shot out of focus. Pin-points of light then look like
globes, or "UFOs." ...And a camera can be moved horizontally in a quick
motion that gives the appearence of sudden movement on the part of the
subject, which may not have moved at all!  Besides, you know I'm going
to take the "devil's advocate" view whenever I get the chance. ;-)
Regards,
Jack
May your glass forever be [.../]
--- FMail 1.22
---------------