Philip Lozier (1:267/169) wrote to Steven Horn at 08:57 on 13 Sep 2002:

 PL> No... based on the fact that 8.7 was stated in my original message
 PL> as being in addition to my concern about the low percentage
 PL> required for the quorum.  That concern, despite my unawareness
 PL> about no changes in 8.7, still exists.

It's not unreasonable to suggest that impeaching a zone coordinator does
not require the zone coordinator to have committed a policy violation. 
What is the policy violation for not doing one's job?  

 PL> Come up with more realistic numbers for a true -majority- decision,
 PL> add a -requirement- for *C participation, and it will fly with
 PL> me... until then... nay.

I'm not with you there.  Given what Fidonet is and has been, the numbers
for a "true majority decision" in the proposal are acceptable. As
for *C participation, the whole scheme is based on that.  They will be
reached but they can't be forced to vote.

Take care,

Steven Horn (steven_a_horn{at}yahoo.ca)
Moderator, ALASKA_CHAT 
--- timEd/386 1.10.y2k+