G'Day andrew,

 ac> 1. Why was this posted in NET_DEV?

Because I know Paul and his SOT/EOT proposal are active in this echo.

 ac> 2. You claim to be conforming to Paul's SOT/EOT proposal.  If this is
 ac> correct, where are the SOT/EOT kludges?

They get lost due to limitations of JAM. I'm looking into it now.

 ac>   Also, your origin line violates Requirement 11 of the proposal.

Explain...

 ac> 3. The data between the brackets in your origin line does not
 ac> constitute a valid network address.  I believe this is in violation of
 ac> FTS-4.

I've explained this to you more than once, Andrew.

Regards, Grant.
Internet: arj{at}lin.cbl.com.au

--- FMail/386 1.01e beta+