Hello Harriet!
In a message to Terri Duval  Harriet Levy wrote:
HL> ==> A hush fell over the room when Terri Duval said to Wagbag <==
HL>  W> commitment. If one just craves the tast of beer, there are excellent
HL>  W> non-alcoholic beers on the market.
 TD>
 TD> There is no such thing as "non-alcoholic" beer.  Any company that
 TD> makes  it can say it's non-alcoholic if it contains 5% or less.  That
HL> Sorry, but what is labeled "non-alcoholic" beer has .5% alcohol by
HL> volume.  Which means that it is 1 proof (not 10), considerably less
HL> than is contained in that container of orange juice that has been
HL> open more than 24 hours that is in your refrigerator.
 TD> meens  that the most potent you'll ever find it is 10 proof.  If you
 TD> read the  labels carefully, you'll find that most of them have 2-3%
 TD> alcohol.
HL> I thin what you're referring to is 3.2 beer, which is sold in "dry"
HL> states like Kansas.  It is not the same as N/A beer.
I just wrote a msg addressing the same thing. I forgot that lots
of things tend to ferment after awile...  I know that when I see
someone with non beer I don't really get upset.
Don't they sell 3.2 beer on military installations? I remember
way back when, when we would go for some beers and get full before
we got high.  ( I learned to drink while in Uncles employ)
So anyway, good to see your type face. Missed you at SD but am
looking forward to Minnesota or wherever it will be (G)
Keep Commin Back !!!   TomA
... We'll take the stairs.
--- GEcho/32 1.20/Pro
---------------