TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! ANSI
echo: english_tutor
to: ALEXANDER KORYAGIN
from: Mike Powell
date: 2018-03-16 18:59:00
subject: to be or not to be that i

> I would write it with "to":
> ....it had ordered Thursday that the cables _to_ be tightened.
> Is there any difference?

Again, I don't know what the rule is, but here are two ways I could think
of writing that:

"... it had ordered Thursday that the cables be tightened..."
"... it had ordered Thursday for the cables to be tightened..."

I believe that "be" is correct when using "that," while
"to be" would be
correct when using "for."

I could also be very wrong.  :)

Mike

---
 þ SLMR 2.1a þ Her voice rings in his ears like the music of the spheres
* Origin: CCO BBS - capitolcityonline.net:26 (1:2320/105)
SEEN-BY: 15/0 16/101 19/36 34/999 90/1 116/18 123/140 153/7715 218/700 220/60
SEEN-BY: 222/2 230/150 240/1120 250/1 261/38 100 266/404 512 267/155 275/100
SEEN-BY: 280/1027 282/1031 1056 291/1 111 320/119 219 340/400 342/13 393/68
SEEN-BY: 396/45 633/267 640/384 712/620 848 770/1 801/161 189 2320/100 105
SEEN-BY: 3634/12 5020/54 1042
@PATH: 2320/105 261/38 712/848 633/267

SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com

Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.