| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | `the` o `a` |
Hi alexander -- on Mar 31 2018 at 23:28, you wrote: ak> I guess that it is the way how words change their meaning or get ak> additional ones. People who know the word poorly may use it in their ak> own way. If such people are heard by many the new meaning begins to ak> live its own life. And the dictionary has no choice but to add the ak> new entry. Actually, I disagree. A dictionary may choose between being prescriptive or descriptive. It would appear that most are choosing to be descriptive, but I (and quite a few others) disagree with that decision and tend to choose our dictionaries on that basis. ak> https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/crescendo The first definition they give is completely correct. The second, however, is a misuse which they themselves recognize by adding the word "climax" (which IS the correct work). ak> From another side: can we make the confrontation stronger? If it can ak> become stronger we can escalate it, as we can escalate any crisis. Here again, MW gives 2 definitions; the first is correct and cannot be escalated (a face to face meeting just is!) and the second definition again is a misuse as they indicate by adding "Conflict" to the definition (which CAN be escalated). ak> I should read more good books. ;-) I would hesitate to say "more", since I don't know how many you read now, but certainly "good" would be, um, good. :-) Cheers... Dallas --- timEd/NT 1.30+* Origin: The BandMaster, Vancouver, CANADA (1:153/7715) SEEN-BY: 57/0 116/102 153/250 310/31 317/2 3 393/68 633/267 640/384 712/620 SEEN-BY: 712/848 770/0 1 100 340 772/0 1 500 @PATH: 153/7715 250 770/1 712/848 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.