From: Adam <""4thwormcastfromthemolehill\"{at}the field.near
the bridge">

Geo wrote:
> "Adam" <""4thwormcastfromthemolehill\"{at}the
field.near the bridge"> wrote in
> message news:446b84fa$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>
>>>>> You miss my point, it was considered a viscous attack,
just like it
> had
>>> been
>>>>> a bombing run or any other high tech type attack.
>>>> Nah it was merely a valid response to being "pissed
beyond restraint".
>>> So are you agreeing with me or do you have a point?
>>>
>>> Geo.
>>>
>>>
>> Nah it's just nice to see that you're agreeing that such actions are all
>> the actions of terrorists.
>
> I say knife or gun or bombs are all a subset of violence and you somehow
> reverse that and say all subsets of violence are a subset of terrorism? No I
> don't agree.
>
> Geo.
>
>
Nope I am saying that you are justifying an act of mil style violence if
one is "pissed beyond restraint".

Sounds mucho like you are in the same boat as ETA, the IRA & AQ &
the Israeli mil.

Adam

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5