12358d88f772
tech



Hello Mike - 

CA>> This is not a 'historical perspective'. I've noticed a few
CA>> _technical_ details that point to truths not in line with
CA>> the general consensus. 

MR> Doh! You might try the UFOS, CONSPIRACIES, AND SASQUATCH
MR> echo... 

MR>  The engineering inquiry found that the bolts holding the 

MR> floor trusses failed when the trusses sagged due to heat
MR> because the fire insulation had been blown off by shrapnel
MR> fragments in the initial impact explosion. Also found was
MR> that the central stairwells walls were inadequate
MR> protection as these consisted of a thin sheet of gyprock. 

All that you say makes sense if I wanted to know why the
building fell down. If you need to know why they BOTH fell
STRAIGHT DOWN it's a bit more complicated IMO. 

Even professional demolition companies don't always get them to
fall straight down - not that straight. 

>
>        ,                                        ,
>      o/      Charles.Angelich  - DOS Ghost       \o       ,
>       __o/
>     / >  www.undercoverdesign.com/dosghost/faf/  < \   __\__
 

--- * ATP/16bit 2.31 * 
... Xmas Music! www.undercoverdesign.com/dosghost/faf/snowsc.htm