CH>RT>Hey Mike.... I've seen more "sniping" coming from your direction.  
eems
  >  >you have some problem with our discussing your post and the "what if's"
  >  >of it.  So be it!  You were there.  We appreciate that, but otherwise,
  >  >you come across as having one humongous chip on your shoulder for some
  >  >reason.
CH>I think a lot of you read what you thought he said.  I never had a
  >problem understanding he was relating information he received about an
  >incident.  No reply neccessary Ron.
Might not be necessary, but ya got one anyhow.
I certainly had no problem understanding Mike's post... didn't need you
to explain it either. I read exactly what Mike said and took it at face
value... an accident happened, an officer got hurt... nothing more,
nothing less _from Mike's post_, but his post brought up a good point
for discussion. We were discussing _that_ point.  Tangential threads
happen all the time on the echos.
Mike's subject line (GlockGOD BELIVERS... emphasis mine) and his
objection to our discussing the Glock were the subject of the quoted
post above.
No reply necessary Charles.... but you are welcome to if you wish.
---
 * QMPro 1.02 42-7029 * Why can't you find a tagline when you need one?
--- WILDMAIL!/WC v4.12 
1:135/5.0)
---------------