From: "Glenn Meadows" 

Destroying missiles that were known to exist in 1998.

Also heard a report today, that he's been changing out the motors in the
missiles, and that the UN is not present during the destruction of the
missiles, just shown the results.

--
Glenn M.


"Geo."  wrote in message
news:3e6d446c$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> "Adam Flinton"  wrote in message
> news:3e6c96c9{at}w3.nls.net...
>
> > Otherwise it's all up in the air as "complete
compliance" is meansured
how
> > exactly? If you don't want war you could point to this or this & if you
> > do...then you can point to this or this & the whole thing is a mess.
>
> what I don't understand is why so many can't see that it is only under the
> threat of war that they have gotten any concessions at all out of Saddam.
> Without the troup buildup do you really think he would have let inspectors
> back in and do you really believe he would have started destroying
missiles?
>
> US troups were ready to go in a couple months ago, the bit with Turkey was
a
> contrived setback in order to keep the threat going without having to take
> action yet. Same with the resolutions in the UN and all the arguing, it's
a
> "hold me back before I kill him" game.
>
> I'm more and more convinced of this. It's like listening to Microsoft talk
> about a release, every time you ask when it's 2 weeks away. That's why
there
> was no deadline, that's why there still isn't a firm deadline but they are
> pushing for one as a way to apply even more pressure.
>
> Geo.
>
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-4