***** Continued From Previous Message *****
ents are
> closely enough modeled by random occurrences that this is a highly
> useful description." 
> 
> JM: 
> Again, I wasn't debating its usefulness. If you can be so kind as to
> point out where it is that I supposedly idicated otherwise I will do my
> best to correct/retract these words. 
>  
> 
> MR: 
> Of course you are debating its usefulness. I'm not debating the
> usefulness of the calculations. You fly as straight as a 
> pipebomb. You are challenging the conclusions based on the employment of
> statistics and therefore are challenging the usefulness of the
> calculations. 
> 
> JM: 
> No. Read what you wrote. (The second does not follow from the first.
> Read it carefully. It's nonsense.) 
> 
> Response: 
> You would be great doing doublespeak in 1984. 
> JM:
> Your understanding of causal processes isn't more advanced than that of
> 1884. 
> 
> Response:
> Was that a good year?
> 
> MR: 
> Subsequently, you are challenging the usefulness of these birth, death,
> and segregation events modeled by random occurences. 
> 
> JM: 
> I'm not challenging the usefulness of these calculations. 
> 
> Jim
---
þ RIMEGate(tm)/RGXPost V1.14 at BBSWORLD * Info{at}bbsworld.com
---
 * RIMEGate(tm)V10.2áÿ* RelayNet(tm) NNTP Gateway * MoonDog BBS
 * RgateImp.MoonDog.BBS at 7/8/03 2:51:52 PM