Jane Kelley On (04 Jan 97) was overheard to say to Jerry Schwartz
 JK> JS>Since you have spoken only in vague terms of "supplements"
 JK> JS>you are leaving it to me to guess what you mean,
 JK> You bet I'm being vague.  Learned in the Alaskan bush a long time ago
 JK> from chronic alcoholics not to give out the content of the protein
 JK> drink I made up for those in jail in withdrawal.  That would make it
 JK> too easy for the other drunks to think that they could keep right on
 JK> drinking, sober up easily, and not suffer any damage to themselves.
 That is just about the clearest statement of position that you have
 made to date.  You consider yourself to be the font of all wisdom,
 dispenser of cures, a virtual cyberspace mother theresa.  <--In my
 thinking a very apt comparison since _her_ credentials have recently
 been held up to close scrutiny and found to be wanting.
 JK> Sometimes it is best to keep one's mouth shut.
 ROFLMAO!!!!!!!
 JK> And in the case of food supplements, we have learned that small
 JK> differences in the composition of formulas are necessary to address
 JK> specific conditions.  ... yet another one will work on the ADHD
 JK> children.
 At the risk of being redundant, ah what the heck, Prove it, usual
 requirements for proof, if you have any that is.
... Some minds are cultivated others are just plowed under.
--- PPoint 2.02
---------------