12358e4dda1e
tech



Hello Robert - 

CA>> I'm confused that we spend all the money we do for GSA,
CA>> NSA, FBI, CIA, and others plus spy satellites and can't
CA>> get advance warnings of such an event nor locate two
CA>> missing airliners in time to force them down (or shoot
CA>> them down if need be). 

RS> My understanding is that they were told NOT to scramble,
RS> because, at that time, we believed that the skyjackers
RS> wanted to survive, and that trying to negotiate and then
RS> waiting for the plane(s) to land was safest and was what we
RS> expected to happen. 

It sounds harsh but our willingness to 'negotiate' only
encourages more of the same. Hijack a plane and we shoot you
down would make hijacking pointless. 

RS> I heard that air traffic controllers were in contact with
RS> at least one plane that said they were trying to return to
RS> land and that the controllers believed them. By the time we
RS> found out otherwise, it was too late. 

I've never been an air taffic controller but I'd wager one with
experience can tell by the flight path if an airliner is trying
to return or has another destination in mind? I don't think
there were many landing opportunities along the flight paths of
any of the airliners that were hijacked. 

A fighter 'escort' just in case would certainly have altered
the outcome in every instance. 

>
>        ,                                        ,
>      o/      Charles_Angelich  - DOS Ghost       \o       ,
>       __o/
>     / >  www.undercoverdesign.com/dosghost/faf/  < \   __\__
 

___ * ATP/16bit 2.31 * 
... Xmas Music! www.undercoverdesign.com/dosghost/faf/snowsc.htm

--- Maximus/2 3.01