On Wed, 06 Jan 1999 20:11:24 GMT, mcculloch@mail.utexas.edu (Jim
McCulloch) wrote:

[Mikes post snipped]
>
>Thanks, Mike, for a diversion from the ongoing discussion, your
>remarks having nothing at all to do with my post or with anyone
>else's, as far as I can tell.
>
>Your reasoning puzzles me, though.  If we are at low risk for
>something, like, say, murder, we should conclude that the low risk
>factors involved do not warrant all the fuss that's being made over
>the subject?  You sure you want to say something like that on such
>newsgroups as tx.guns and talk.politics.guns?  

All he did was point out that it isn't anywhere nearly as dangerous
out there as you and the anti groups would make it look.  In fact the
only places that there is a lot of danger tends to be where guns have
been banned.  That should be telling you something but I guess you
just don't want to hear the message.  Typical close minded liberal.
>
>Best regards,
>
>--Jim McCulloch
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

William Harvey
wharvey@win.net
http://www.win.net/~wharvey