| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Modems.. |
PE> I would normally recommend you stick with 14400
PE> unless you can cost-justify the increase.
RS> Or you can say that at sub $200 class money, even just reducing the
RS> irritation level is justifiable, particularly with net stuff where
RS> you are often sitting at the machine waiting for something to happen.
RS> Its different with say a download where it can be done in the background.
PE> # 19 Dec 05:49:52.60 CONNECT 14400/LAP-M/V.42bis
PE> * 19 Dec 05:49:53.10 Rod Speed (3:711/934.2{at}fidonet)
PE> * 19 Dec 05:49:53.10 Remote Uses FrontDoor 2.02/Noncommercial
PE> : 19 Dec 05:49:53.10 SysOp: Rod Speed from Griffith, NSW
You think thats supposed to be news do you ?
PE> Rod, at sub $200 class money, even reducing the
PE> irritation level is justifiable for you to go to 28.8k.
It is indeed. I just havent got around to it yet, I like a modem with lots of
status info during the call, particularly on the speed and error detail and
havent found one with what I consider to be particularly good on those details
yet. Got nothing to do with the cost justification for the speed at all.
@EOT:
---
* Origin: afswlw rjfilepwq (3:711/934.2)SEEN-BY: 711/934 712/610 @PATH: 711/934 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.