-=> Quoting Roger Nelson to Ross Sauer <=-
 
 RS> Well, I've decided to jump back in here, seeing as I was getting
 RS> bored over in Skeptic just watching the argument over this
 RS> (supposed) Iranian "UFO."
 RN> 
 RN> Are you sure that's all they argue about?  (-:
 
Mostly. There are other things now, but GJO, FR, and (another) RS are
simply trading insults and taking up most of the postings.
 
 RS> In other words, "eyewitness testimony" I won't buy.
 RN> 
 RN> Why not?  If you say you saw something, are we not to believe you?
 
Because I very easily could be mistaken or just plain lying.
 
 RS> Photos need to be real, and legible. Same with videos.
 RN> 
 RN> Agreed.
 
Problem is how to set the standard there.
 
 RS> And I'm sure by now some of you already know I have a sometimes
 RS> savage sense of humor, especially when dealing with loons.
 RN> 
 RN> "Loons" by whose standards?
 
By anyone besides the loon.
If someone came in here and posted, "I'm an alien, because I say so!"
by nearly everyone's standards that person would be a loon.
 
 RS> And if I see a loony post, I'll say so.
 RN> 
 RN> Depends on what you say and how you say it.
 
Most often, I'll say, "That sounds nuts!"
 
 RS> BTW, I am laughing my head off at the "face on Mars" people like
 RS> Richard Hoagland, now that he's been PROVEN to be simply full of
 RN> 
 RN> People sometimes see what they want to see.  I considered the original
 RN> photos  nothing more than a Rorschach test.
 
To me, it's simply a screwup based on a poor resolution photo.
Yet Hoagland, to defend his money-making video is saying NASA has a
"conspiracy" to hide the "truth." Figures.
I kind of predicted he would say that.
 
      Ross Sauer    patch@bbs.sts.net    patch@bytehead.com
 
___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.20 [NR]
--- TriToss (tm) 1.03 - (Unregistered)
---------------