TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! ANSI
echo: c_plusplus
to: BOB STOUT
from: JERRY COFFIN
date: 1997-07-16 02:36:00
subject: Signs of numbers

On (15 Jul 97) Bob Stout wrote to Cameron Clark...
 BS>   Yeah, but the code in question determines whether a numer is
 BS> negative or not by testing the high bit. On a 1's complement
 BS> machine (yes, there are such beasts and they do have C
 BS> compilers), it will fail.
I don't think so - the high bit is set for negative numbers on a 1's
complement machine, just like it is on a 2's complement machine.  It
should also work on a sign-magnitude machine.
However, it would fail on a machine that used biasing, like the
exponents of most floating point numbers.
As I understand things, the current C9X proposal includes a requirement
for 1's complement, 2's complement or sign-magnitude.  I've never
actually heard of a machine that used biasing for integers.  Obviously
none of this would work on a decimal machine, but the C standard
requires a "pure binary" representation for ints.  I haven't tried to
check this in the C++ standard, but I believe its requirements are
probably closer to those of C90 than C9X.
    Later,
    Jerry.
... The Universe is a figment of its own imagination.
--- PPoint 1.90
---------------
* Origin: Point Pointedly Pointless (1:128/166.5)

SOURCE: echomail via exec-pc

Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.