PM> qsort(list, n, sizeof(list[0]), sort);

 PE> Which is a better solution that sizeof(char *), because you
 PE> don't need to have the data type of list[0] coded in multiple
 PE> places. 

  Yair... I'd worked that out already. In fact I've TRIED it all
FUCKING ready. And it doesn't work.

 PE> Personally I would use "sizeof list[0]" rather than
 PE> "sizeof(list[0])", for the same reason that I don't go x = (3)
 PE> * (4). BFN. Paul. 

  That's the left-handed reverse wank, is it?

Regards,
Bob

___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.12
@EOT:

---