Hello, Thom...

Sep 12, 2002 at 15:36, Thom LaCosta wrote to Dale Shipp:

 TL> Dale Shipp wrote in a message to Thom Lacosta:

 TL>  -=> On 09-11-02  21:36, Thom Lacosta <=-
 TL>  -=> spoke to Bob Short about P4 Draft (ver. 5) <=-

 TL>> Can Ward, in and of himself, change existing rules on the fly?

 DS>>    No.  At best, he can interpret them.

 TL> But now I'm confused...I thought Bob said that per Ward the number of 
 TL> RC's required to vote wasn't what's in P4.

 TL> If that's the case, what other things could the IC "interpret"(ie 
 TL> change)?

Anything, I suppose, depending upon the degree of outrage it provoked. In
this case, Ward is in effect interpreting whether or not a non-existent RC
is in fact an RC for the purposes of this vote. I consider that reasonable.

Regards,

Jerry Schwartz

mailto:jerryschwartz{at}comfortable.com
http://www.writebynight.com

@EOT:
--- Msged/NT 6.0.1