On 13 Oct 97 11:29, Al And Masha Sten-Clanton said to All:
 AA> You wrote, Mike, that you know of an
 AA> instance in which a resolution was
 AA> passed because "everyone" thought it
 AA> would fail, and so no one spoke
 AA> against it, and the resolution's
 AA> ambiguities were ignored. Just out of
 AA> curiosity, which resolution was it? 
I don't remember the number now; it was passed in either 1992 or 
1993.  It marginally softened our stance against audible traffic 
signals.  I thought it was somewhat ambiguous and blurred our 
unambiguous anti-pee-pee-caw-caw policy.  I thought its 
ambiguities would keep it from passing so I didn't rush to the 
microphone to tell the Emperor he had no clothes.  Turns out I was 
wrong.  The resolution passed.
 AA> Also, does anyone remember what
 AA> Resolution 97-15 was--the one that was
 AA> overwhelmingly voted down by the
 AA> resolutions committee?  Thanks.
I was there but the nature of the resolution escapes me now.  I'll 
probably remember just after I've sent off this reply packet! 
(smirk)
MIke Freeman 
Internet: mikef@pacifier.com
--- PCRR QWK 1.60
--- FLAME v1.1
---------------