*** Quoting Dan Ceppa from a message to Carol Shenkenberger ***

 CS> I don't think 'Russian Fidonet' would survive the splintering if the
 CS> crossover was done 'node by node'.  At the minimum, it would have to
 CS> be 'net by net' or a mess would ensue. 

DC> The point is that something has to be done.  

Actually the point is no one has a plan, including them.  I posted on some
time ¨back (pretty sure was in ZCC) and no one argued with the method, only
a few ¨notes that since it was moot, it was wasted typing time.

It's not my job or area at all to have even gone that far but it was more
than ¨I saw any Z2 affected node even try. So like, what are the rest of us
supposed ¨to do?  Only 15% or so of R50 bothered to even reply to the
query.  What do we ¨do?  Force 85% to do as that small segment wants when
even what that small ¨segmnt wants isnt clear and there's no plan?

There's either a HUGE dead-wood component in R50, or a small segment is
being ¨vocal and the rest think they are nuts and ignoring them.  Unless we
can get a ¨clearer picture, forcing the 85% or so to do something they do
not want, is ¨just wrong.
                                       xxcarol

--- Telegard v3.09.g2-sp4