TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! ANSI
echo: nfb-talk
to: RICHARD WEBB
from: MIKE FREEMAN
date: 1997-10-16 10:21:00
subject: LIBERTARIANS, WAS ACB POS

This isn't germane to NFB philosophy but I'll make a few comments 
and leave it at that.
On 11 Oct 97 17:53, Richard Webb wrote:
 RW> As for bread lines, you don't see many
 RW> libertarians in them, but you
 RW> see a lot of folks  who are second or
 RW> third generation standers in
 RW> said bread lines .  This is real
 RW> sad, but it's time to break the
 RW> cycle.  Our system should work,
 RW> butthere are too many layers of crap
 RW> in the way of getting things done. 
A few observations:  privatizing things won't help.  There is just 
as much bureaucracy in the private sector as there is in 
government.  Else how explain the phenomenal success of Dilbert?  
(incidentally, I think every Newsline site should have a "Dilbert 
Channel" wherein each day's Dilbert strip would be described -- 
grin).  If you don't believe me, try calling your bank or mortgage 
company.  "Press One for This ... Press Two for That ..." and so 
on ad infinitum.
Although I agree with you that we must break the generation-after- 
generation welfare cycle and the cycle of hopelessness in the 
inner cities, what gripes me about Libertarians and right-wingers 
in general is that they say the present system isn't working so 
should be torn down but don't propose anything practical in its 
place.  Were I President, I'd just love to get a bunch of real 
pinko liberals in a room and say "Okay!  You say we need to use 
government to relieve poverty and ameliorate the bum conditions in 
society.  now, tell me how to do that on a shoe-string budget." 
I'd also like to get all the laissez-faire capitalists and go-it- 
alone types in a room and say:  "Okay; you'r right; the 
bureaucracy is stifling initiative.  Now, tell me how you would 
help the down-and-out?And don't fall back on just saying they 
don't matter.  I know you probably feel that some deserve to 
starve but that's not an option.  And don't talk about private 
charity taking up the slack.  First, it won't work because they 
don't want to put in the time, effort and resources to help those 
who *really* need it.  Second, ever been the victim - er - 
recipient of one of those charities?"
I am very, very uncomfortable with affirmative action.  I would 
have voted for Prop 209 in California.  yet I am very leary of 
just yanking affirmative programs because no one has *really* 
proposed anything to take their place.  I resent to my dying day 
that I was hired Schedule A.  But I'd much rather have the 
paycheck than not!
In other words, it's extremely easy to spout simplistic solutions 
to problems you don't have to solve.  it's damnably difficult to 
come up with something that actually might work and that doesn't 
pander to some special interest or other or, rather, which pinches 
all special interests equally.
 RW> Javits Wagner ODay and the great
 RW> society were both bad ideas.  Maybe
I might agree with you.  But consider: many thought that workshops 
might make sense when no one else was hiring.  That they paid a 
pittance was as much a consequence of the contempt in which 
workers in general were held as to anything else.  Remember Ford 
Morots with Harry Bennett and his goon squad?  And yes, the Great 
Society was probably eutopian.  But it can be argued that it would 
have worked better if President Johnson hadn't been trying to have 
guns and butter at the same time.  I'm not necessarily disagreeing 
with you; I'm just saying that things are more complex than most 
of us would care to admit.
 RW> pretty on the surface, but the
 RW> premise in the first was totaly wrong,
 RW> and the second was real badly
 RW> implemented.
As I say, I won't argue with you here.
 RW> Btw, liked your comments on grade 3
 RW> braille.  I still find it useful
 RW> today, and am glad I took the time to learn it.
 RW> Notice I didn't learn it at the school
 RW> for the blind in preparation
 RW> for junior high and high school, but
Neither did I; I taught myself from a book by Ruth Something-or- 
other.  I've lost the book but believe I still have Rodenberg's 
reference book on Grade III.
Mike Freeman 
Internet: mikef@pacifier.com
--- PCRR QWK 1.60
--- FLAME v1.1
---------------
* Origin: Pacifier Online Data Service (1:105/101)

SOURCE: echomail via exec-pc

Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.