Hello Dan.

06 Jul 06 12:15, you wrote to Carol Shenkenberger:

 CS>> It was low turnout.  However, no matter how low, all reports of
 CS>> it were passed to the ZCC echo as best as possible.  The initial
 CS>> one by

 DC> A low turnout doesn't necessarily mean that change is not just
 DC> requested but is needed.  I can quickly give you an example of
 DC> a similar situation.  You may not like it though!

Change is needed, but the time or two that it has been attempted, it has been 
scuppered by arsewipes, who do their level best to kill it.

 CS>> Ward who forwarded what he had, and a later one that matched but
 CS>> was a

 DC> Far better to get the information directly from the source.

 DC> Has it occured to you that FIDO standards for change are exactly
 DC> why FIDO remains in the Dark Ages?

No, it has not, but I have seen a bunch of arsewipes scuttle any attempts to 
do that, they'ed be happier with fidonet dying to-morrow, than it being 
allowed to adapt to the changing world around them, and fidonet.

 CS>> I cantr imagine anything worse, than splintering the Russian
 CS>> sysops against their will.  Let *them* decide this.

 DC> Russian involvement in this, as well as far less non-controversial
 DC> international Echoes, is on sharp decline.  Why is that?

Arsewipe intervention and abuse ... , by those determined to scuttle fidonet 
...

 DC> The opportunity to keep FIDO alive is being squandered away in the
 DC> expense of building castles instead of constructing d'bridges needed
 DC> to benefit FIDO as a whole...

Tell that to fidonets destructors,detractors,arsewipes, and other negative 
behaving citizens of fidoland.

Russell

--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5