Mike Angwin wrote in a message to Mark Fornoff:
MF>What would you think of a Bush-Forbes ticket?
 MA>  
 MA>           A good guess at this point.  It has regional diversity
 MA> which is usually looked for in a VP choice.  Somehow though, the
 MA> personalities of Bush and Forbes seem to be a bit more divergent
 MA> than I would think best.  However, the same thing existed between
 MA> Reagan and Bush Sr., could work.  I don't see Quayle being selected
 MA> by anyone as a VP again even if he were willing to take the
 MA> job...too much negative baggage which will also deny him the party
 MA> nomination for the forseeable future.  Kemp might make a run but
 MA> he's just not going to take the party nomination either.  I'm
 MA> really surprised more of a fuss wasn't kicked up over Dole's
 MA> selection of him as a running mate last time around.  
Why?  There's a real chance he was picked as a sort of reward for his service
to Reagan and Bush.  It wouldn't be the first time.
 MA>            A Bush - Forbes ticket could become a reality.  If you
 MA> want to think about a dark horse with presidential potential and an
 MA> electable character in the Republican party, what do you think
 MA> about Trent Lott. 
An interesting choice.  I thought his reply to the State of the Union address
was exceptional.  There's a real chance he's not ready, though, and would be 

VP candidate at best.  I am intrigued by Gov. Bush. I'll have to listen to 
ee
if Rush is saying anything about him, and then do some research of my own. 
What is his status among Texans?
-- Mark
... Error 999 - Sysop confused.  Press enter to return to reality.
--- FMailX32 1.22
---------------