-=> Quoting Relatif Tuinn to Andrew Cummins <=-
 RT> Which would be logical. They do however offer evidence for their
 RT> theories which is open to be tested.
Then let them bring 'em on.
 AC> And, of course, any evidence to the
 AC> contrary to Evolution dismissed with the creation of sub-theories
 AC> to reconcile contradicting evidence.
 RT> Such as?
Darwin reasonably predicted that innumerable transitional
forms should be found in the fossil record.  When this
didn't turn out to be accurate, Evolutionists hypothisized
that Evolution operates in a mode of Punctuated Equilibrium.
Punctuated Equilibrium certainly doesn't exist because
someone discovered compelling evidence for it or a mechanism.
 
 RT> Then maybe you'd like to post the Creationist model that you speak of,
 RT> AND what it predicts, and allow us to make our own judgments?
Consider an aspect of the Creation model: the relatively
recent appearance of a multitude of kinds of animals of independent
origin.  That predicts the absence of transitional forms.
 RM>> 2) Creationism stems from a belief in "God".  The key word here is 
 RM>> "belief", which makes creationism a religion and has no place being
 RM>> argued as a science.
 AC> Evolution stems from the belief that there is no God.
 RT> So it's nothing to do with the millions of fossils and bones then?
And, here I thought that you were making an attempt to be
something more than a moron.
___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.12
--- QScan/PCB v1.19b / 01-0066
---------------