| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Z7 again |
-> On 06 Jul 06 15:15:42, Carol Shenkenberger got back to Dan Ceppa -> Re: Z7 again DC> It wasn't low turnout. But, I do agree that a future poll needs DC> to narrow down the options. As it is, the results do state that DC> some action is needed. The lowest response was for the option DC> of doing nothing. CS> It was low turnout. However, no matter how low, all reports of it CS> were passed to the ZCC echo as best as possible. The initial one by A low turnout doesn't necessarily mean that change is not just requested but is needed. I can quickly give you an example of a similar situation. You may not like it though! CS> Ward who forwarded what he had, and a later one that matched but was a Far better to get the information directly from the source. CS> bit more specific. Both were the same as posted here in the IC echo. CS> I may be wrong here, (can go back and check) but I think Renato was CS> the first one to say it was just too small of a number based on the CS> size of R50. The 'referendum' was as widely sent as they could, with Has it occured to you that FIDO standards for change are exactly why FIDO remains in the Dark Ages? CS> reasonable expectation that all in R50 and those 2 other regions we'd CS> nominally call 'Russian speaking' had it in their netmail as well as CS> sysop echos multiple times. Not ONE R50 sysop has denied this. So, CS> tell me why a paultry 15% replied with something like 8% wanting a CS> change and 7% bothering to say 'no thanks'? See above. Per the assinine quorum rules, nothing will ever change in FIDO ever again. As it stands, it appears that War Lords are more concerned about protecting their own little fiefdoms than they are in the system as whole. CS> I cantr imagine anything worse, than splintering the Russian sysops CS> against their will. Let *them* decide this. Russian involvement in this, as well as far less non-controversial international Echoes, is on sharp decline. Why is that? The opportunity to keep FIDO alive is being squandered away in the expense of building castles instead of constructing d'bridges needed to benefit FIDO as a whole... --- OMX/Blue Wave/DOS v2.30* Origin: Soundly on the Fault Line (1:138/666.0) SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 5030/786 @PATH: 138/666 146 140/1 106/2000 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.