| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Why no airmobility? |
Replying to a message of Adam Flinton to Monte Davis:
AF> From: "Adam Flinton"
AF> "Monte Davis" wrote in message
AF> news:653u7v44qs1kl5r5v8bb3fq1lklttk99jr{at}4ax.com...
>> "Adam Flinton" wrote:
>>
>>> How come no airmobility?... how come no sudden jumps?
>>>
>>> At the mo it's a fairly std armoured/mechanized thrust.
>>
>> Yesterday the 101st Airborne/Air Assault got its forward fuel/ordnance
>> base set up -- sounded like roughly halfway from the border to
>> Baghdad. So I would now expect a lot more Apache action and sudden
>> company-sized "appearances" in awkward places.
AF> Yup. OK. However a fair chunk of the last few years (e.g. the whole
AF> design of the C17 & the procurement of LAV/Stryker vehicles) was to
AF> get real solid forces into places where the enemy never though they'd
AF> appear. i.e it's one thing to suddenly have a flight of apache or
AF> some airborne troops arrive at your door. It's another to suddenly
AF> find a reasonable number of Main battle tanks (e.g. M1'es or
AF> Challengers) & infantry fighting vehicles (e.g. Bradleys or Warriors)
AF> knocking.
AF> We have captured C17 capable strips.
A C17 may be able to handle a Bradley, but it takes a C-5 to tote an Abrams.
---
* Origin: Bob's Soapbox, Plattsmouth, Nebraska, USA (1:379/103.104)SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 379/103 1 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.