From: "Paul Ranson" 

Iraq invaded and pillaged another independent nation. That justified
interference. After that interference Iraq made a settlement, which they've
endlessly reneged upon. Further interference is justified on those grounds.
It may not be sensible, but it is justified.

Paul

"Alan Cairns"  wrote in message
news:BA767763.9821%alancairns{at}dccnet.com...
> Iraq is an independent nation. However bad its government may be, it is
not
> for us to interfere, absent an immediate threat. I see no threat.
>
> Alan
>
> On 17/02/2003 7:57 AM, in article 3e510456$1{at}w3.nls.net, "Robert
G Lewis"
r.g.lewis{at}verizon.net> wrote:
>
> > Saddam could do something like agree to let in a large group of French
or
> > Belgium forces to search. That way he could show he was willing to show
he
> > had met his obligations but also stood up against the 'evil' US
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-4