-=> Quoting Paul Andinach to Fred Austin <=-
 -=> Quoting Fred Austin to Paul Andinach <=-
 
 PA> Your argument:
 
 PA> There are billions of stars.
 
 PA> My response:
 PA> The fault in that argument is that this is not an either/or
 PA> situation. Some of the stories could be true, and the rest false. Of
 PA> those that are false, some people could be crazy, some could be lying
 PA> outright, and some could just have been honestly mistaken.
 PA> Just making sure you understood what I was getting at.
 PA> Now, you were saying?
    I actually do not know what  I was  saying since  it must  have been  a 
while back, and you omitted it from the post.  I did not post the  billions 
of stars therefore point.  But obviously I stated something along the lines 
of how are you so certain.  And that is basically  the problem,  with 'any' 
type of story in this world.  You cannot always determine  truth from  math 
logic, nor does your logic apply  to unknowns.   You cannot  apply true  or 
false logic based on  an unknown  quantity can  you?  I  suggest behavioral 
science or psychology, or just plain common sense would  be a  better tool 
for weeding out the 98 percent bogus offerings in Ufology.....
Happy Trails,
Fred.
--- Blue Wave/DOS v2.30
---------------