ZZ>
  >   > What do you think about First Step?  Isn't that the
  >   > hobbyist version of the full CSet++?
  >
  > JdeBP> It's a "streamlined" version of CSet++.  I have the full
  > JdeBP> version.
  >
  > Which are true?
  >
  > A) Code is cruddy
  > B) Doesn't come with some things
  > C) Runs faster
  > D) Uses less memory
  > E) Can't do everything (enumerate)
ZZ>

  I don't know about future versions of CSet++ First Step, but for
  previous versions (B) and (D) were true.  First Step didn't have
  EXTRA, the Browser, or ICLUI in the bundle, and the compiler didn't
  have an optimiser.

  ( So possibly (A) is valid, but it has connotations that are really
    unwarranted.  Lack of an optimiser implies *inefficient* code, not
    *incorrect* code. )

ZZ>
  > JdeBP>   ( In fact I have the beta of CSet++ 3.0, but I'm not
  > JdeBP>     allowed to talk about it. )
  >
  > When's that coming out?
ZZ>

  I just said that I wasn't allowed to talk about it !

  > JdeBP <
___
 X MegaMail 2.10 #0:
--- Maximus/2 2.02